Scientific Review and Editing Bundle

Maximize your chances with the

Publication Success Package

Perfect your paper, navigate peer review, and secure publication.

Wave Image

Thrive in the publication arena

Research Is Hard, but Publishing Shouldn't Be!

Get support at every step of your publication journey.

Scientific and Language Accuracy
  • The Reality: Even interesting, good-quality research can be rejected if it's unclear or contains content errors.
  • The Challenge: Journals expect professionalism—you need to provide an easy-to-read manuscript that clearly communicates your research process and findings.
  • The Solution: Our professional editing package ensures the scientific accuracy, clarity, and readability expected by high impact-factor journals.

A Smarter Way to Get Published

All-in-One Solution for Publication Success

Get published faster and with confidence. Our Publication Success Package readies your manuscript for submission with expert support at every stage—from journal selection to language, structure, and compliance.

Subject-Matter Content Review

  • Expert feedback with insightful comments on your methodology, data interpretation, and storytelling
  • Suggested revisions to strengthen your manuscript prior to peer review
  • Journal suitability assessment to ensure your manuscript aligns with the scope, standards, and expectations of your chosen target journal
1

Response Letter Editing and Revision Check

  • Expert editing of your response letter and manuscript revisions
  • A thorough point-by-point review ensuring that your responses and revisions effectively address peer reviewers' comments
3
1

Subject-Matter Content Review

  • Expert feedback with insightful comments on your methodology, data interpretation, and storytelling
  • Suggested revisions to strengthen your manuscript prior to peer review
  • Journal suitability assessment to ensure your manuscript aligns with the scope, standards, and expectations of your chosen target journal
2

Subject-Matter Editing

Editing by subject-matter experts to improve accuracy, readability, and impact

Journal Formatting

Compliance with your target journal's author guidelines

Editing Certificate

A certificate to include in your submission showing your manuscript has been professionally edited

Cover Letter Preparation

A persuasive cover letter designed to capture the journal editor's attention and highlight the significance of your research

3

Response Letter Editing and Revision Check

  • Expert editing of your response letter and manuscript revisions
  • A thorough point-by-point review ensuring that your responses and revisions effectively address peer reviewers' comments
∞

Unlimited Language Editing

  • Unlimited language editing for clarity, style, and grammar
  • Freedom to revise your manuscript as many times as you need for up to one year

Achieve Publication Success Today!

Ready to publish with confidence? Our Publication Success Package guarantees expert editing, rigorous quality checks, and unlimited reedits. Take the next step today!

Instant Quote   

Achieve Publication Success Today!

Ready to publish with confidence? Our Publication Success Package guarantees expert editing, rigorous quality checks, and unlimited reedits. Take the next step today!

Instant Quote   

Subject-Matter Editing

Editing by subject-matter experts to improve accuracy, readability, and impact

Journal Formatting

Compliance with your target journal's author guidelines

Editing Certificate

A certificate to include in your submission showing your manuscript has been professionally edited

Cover Letter Preparation

A persuasive cover letter designed to capture the journal editor's attention and highlight the significance of your research

2

Unlimited Language Editing

  • Unlimited language editing for clarity, style, and grammar
  • Freedom to revise your manuscript as many times as you need for up to one year
∞

On-Time Delivery

Your deadlines matter. We never miss them.

Bank-Grade Security

Advanced encryption keeps your work safe.

Confidentiality Assured

All experts sign NDAs for complete privacy.

Satisfaction Guaranteed

We're not done until you're fully satisfied.

Expert Editors

Specialists in your field refine your research.


Featured Experts

Meet Some of the Experts Who Work on Our Publication Success Packages

Scribendi and our partner company, Edanz, have built a team of 300+ scientific and research experts over 25 years, helping tens of thousands of researchers get published.

Dr. Anya Lissina

Dr. Anya Lissina

Immunology

Editorial Partner Consultant Scientist Reviewer
Dr. Adam Brotchie

Dr. Adam Brotchie

Chemistry

Editorial Partner Consultant Scientist Reviewer
Dr. Katherine Halievski

Dr. Katherine Halievski

Neuroscience

Editorial Partner Consultant Scientist Reviewer
Dr. Philip Pape

Dr. Philip Pape

Engineering

Editorial Partner Consultant Scientist Reviewer
Dr. Carol Wilson

Dr. Carol Wilson

Endocrinology

Editorial Partner Consultant Scientist Reviewer

Content Review & Editing Sample

Explore How We Work with a Manuscript

Check out sample edits as well as editorial and scientific comments in this paper about peripheral nerve injury!

An Analysis of Repair by a Nerve Connector as an Alternative for Direct Repair in Peripheral Nerve Injury

Introduction

Nerve injuries impose a heavy burden on patients' quality of life. Though direct epineurium and perineurium sutures are the classic techniques most commonly used for peripheral nerve injury, they are often accompanied with undesirable tension and their surgical outcomes are less than satisfactory.(1)(2)(3)(4) Such could be due to misalignments such as miss direction, overlapping and buckling of axons, ingrowth of scar tissue into the repair site and tension-induced ischemia around the stumps, all leading to poor fascicular coaptation.(5) To overcome these problems, several newer technologies such as connector repair have been considered.(6)

Previous studies have suggested that utilizing a nerve conduit as a connector for peripheral nerve repair, covering the repair site and leaving a very short gap between the stumps, provides outcomes that are equivalent to, or better than, direct suture repair.(7)(8)(9) It is generally considered that nerves regenerate along the length of the nerve conduit in a selective manner such that the proximal motor nerves migrate to join the distal motor nerves.(10)(11) The intentional gap in the connector is known to provide an area for selective reinnervation encouraging natural re-growth preventing the forementioned misalignments.

Connector also provides a physical barrier preventing infiltration of scar tissue in effect allowing diffusion of nutrients to the healing repair site.(12)(13) The barrier prevents the potential uncontrolled sprouting to the outside of the coaptation site(12) while the additional length relocates the sutures away from the coaptation site reducing the risk of tension and tension-induced ischemia around the stumps. The use of connectors also reduces the number of sutures required for the nerve coaptation, which potentially reduces surgical time.(6)(12)

While the employment of nerve conduit as a nerve connector has been known to achieve outcomes equivalent to, or better than direct suture repair, its underlying mechanism and how the axons behave in the conduit still remain unclear. The present study investigates the peripheral nerve repair mechanism inside an artificial nerve conduit through a short gap. Serial in-vivo imaging using transgenic mice which constitutively express YFP fluorescence and analysis of gene expressions at the repair site were conducted while varioius histomorphometric measurements were taken. The results were compared against the direct suture repair counter-part and the control. The final recovery was quantified through functional assessments.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of nerve conduit

Bioabsorbable PGA conduit filled with collagen in honeycomb-like structure (Nerbridge, Toyobo Co. Ltd. Fig. 1A) used in this study are commercially available and have been approved as a medical device for clinical practice by the Japanese Government since 2013. This artificial nerve was selected for this study for its robustness. The tube was made of PGA fiber mesh, permeable for particles smaller than 600 KD, with the inner diameter of 1 mm and the length of 55 ± 5 mm, designed to biodegrade 3 months after transplantation in vivo.(14) For the present study, only the outer cylinder without the inner honeycomb shaped collagen was used(14) after soaking in saline for 5 minutes.(15)

Experimental Animals

In this study, 64 transgenic mice (Thy1-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) 16, available from The Jackson Laboratory, strain B6. Cg-Tg (Thy1-YFP) 16 Jrs/J) with all axon fibers of motor and sensory nerves constitutively expressing YFP fluorescence were employed (8-12 weeks old, weighing 23-28 g, 32 males and 32 females, Fig. 1B, C and D). The animal husbandry was conducted in accordance to standards and regulations provided by the National Institutes of Health Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The study was approved by the Animal Care Committee of Juntendo University. Mice were kept in groups of four in a sterile cage maintained at 22℃ ± 2℃ and 40-60% humidity under a 12-hour light/dark cycle. The mice had free access to water and 15-kGy gamma-irradiated feed (CRF-1, Oriental Yeast Co.). Animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation under deep anesthesia after the grafts were harvested.

Experimental model

The experimental group (n = 48) underwent a nerve transection procedure to create an injury to both sciatic nerves which were later followed by two types of repair operations, direct epineurium suture (right hind limb) and artificial nerve connector (left hind limb). The control group (n = 16) underwent the same procedure without the nerve transection or the repair operation. Equal number of female and male mice were assigned to each group.

-Creation of sciatic nerve injury model

Experimental group were anesthetized with inhalation anesthesia of sevoflurane (5% sevoflurane for induction, 2% for maintenance). A 15 mm skin incision was made parallel to the femur on the both hind limbs to expose the sciatic nerves. For manipulation of the sciatic nerve, a microscope was used (MZ16FA, Leica Microsystems). Once the nerve was detached from the surrounding tissues, it was transected at the halfway between the hip and knee joint (Fig. 1E, F and G). Femoral muscle was partially peeled and placed between the nerve stumps to avoid natural reconnection and the wound was closed using 5-0 nylon. The animals were left for 2 weeks for the formation of Wallerian degeneration in the distal stump before the repair operations were conducted.

-Repair operations

The experimental group underwent the repair operation two weeks after the initial operation. Under anesthesia, the wound was reopened and the sciatic nerve stumps were exposed under the microscope (Fig. 1H and I). The formation of Wallerian degeneration was confirmed through the disappearance of YFP fluorescence expression in the distal stump (Fig. 1J and K). The end of both stumps were debrided to the minimum extent in order to remove the neuromas and two types of nerve repair were performed to each hind limb.

Epineurium suture – direct repair (DR): To every right hindlimb, a direct epineurium suture was conducted with two stitches of 9-0 nylon (Fig. 2A, B and C).

Nerve repair using nerve connector - connector repair (CR): Every left hindlimb was repaired using a 3 mm artificial nerve. The artificial nerve was interposed with a stitch of 9-0 nylon on either end. Approximately 1 mm of the nerve-ends were inserted into the conduit leaving a distance of 1 mm between the stumps inside the conduit (Fig. 2A, D and E).

Quantitative RT-PCR

To analyze the gene expressions at the repair site, in the case of DR, tissues between 1 mm proximal and 1 mm distal from the suture, and in the case of CR, all tissues inside the conduit, were harvested and examined by qRT-PCR at 3 days, 1 week and 2 weeks after the repair operation (n = 24). Expressions of a macrophage migration marker (CD68), an angiogenesis marker (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)), an endothelial maker (CD31(PECAM-1)), Schwan cell migration markers (SOX10, S100) and neurotrophins (neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and nerve growth factor (NGF)) were analyzed. The tissues were extracted and stored in RNAlater solution at −4°C overnight, and then at −80°C until RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted with RNeasy Plus Universal Mini kit (QIAGEN), and purity and concentration were assessed using a NanoPhotometer (IMPLEN). RNA samples with a 260 nm/280 nm ratio between 1.8 and 2.0 were used for qRT-PCR. We used a high-capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit (Applied Biosystems) for reverse transcription into cDNA and TaqMan Fast Advanced Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) for qRT-PCR. All primers were purchased from Applied Biosystems, and measured values were compared with GAPDH as a reference gene. The thermocycling conditions were 95°C for 20 seconds, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 3 seconds and 62°C for 30 seconds, on an ABI 7500 FAST PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The amount of each target gene relative to the GAPDH reference gene was determined using the comparative threshold cycle method, and the mean values were calculated.

Repair using a nerve connector as an alternative for direct repair in peripheral nerve injury

Introduction

Nerve injuries can impose a heavy burden on patients' quality of life. Although direct epineurial and perineurial sutures are commonly used for peripheral nerve injury, they are often accompanied by undesirable tension and their surgical outcomes can be less than satisfactory.1-4 These sutures can cause axon misalignments (such as misdirection, overlapping, and buckling), scar tissue ingrowth into the repair site, or tension-induced ischemia around the stumps, all of which can lead to poor fascicular coaptation.5 To overcome these problems, several newer methods, such as connector repair, have been considered.6

Previous studies have suggested that using a nerve conduit as a connector (covering the repair site and leaving a very short gap between the stumps) for peripheral nerve repair provides outcomes that are equivalent to, or better than, those of direct suture repair.7-9 Nerves generally regenerate along the length of the nerve conduit in a selective manner, with proximal motor nerves migrating to join distal motor nerves.10,11 The intentional gap in the connector provides an area for this selective reinnervation, thus encouraging natural regrowth while preventing misalignments.

The connector also provides a physical barrier to prevent the infiltration of scar tissue, allowing the diffusion of nutrients to the repair site.12,13 This barrier prevents any potential uncontrolled sprouting outside the coaptation site,12 and its length relocates the sutures away from the coaptation site, thus reducing the risk of tension and tension-induced ischemia around the stumps. The use of a connector also decreases the number of sutures required for nerve coaptation, which may reduce surgical time.6,12

The use of a nerve conduit as a connector has reportedly achieved outcomes equivalent to, or better than, those produced by direct suture repair; however, the underlying mechanisms of the conduit and the response of the axons in it remain unclear. In the present study, we investigate the peripheral nerve repair mechanisms of an artificial nerve conduit across a short gap. To do this, we performed serial in vivo imaging of transgenic mice that constitutively express yellow fluorescent protein (YFP), analyzed gene expression at the repair site, and recorded various histomorphometric measurements. We compared all conduit repair findings against their direct suture repair counterparts and against the control. Final recovery was quantified through functional assessments.

Methods

Preparation of nerve conduit

For the present study, we used a bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid (PGA) conduit filled with collagen in a honeycomb-like structure (Nerbridge, Toyobo Co. Ltd.; Fig. 1A); this product is commercially available and has been approved by the Japanese government as a medical device for clinical practice since 2013. We selected this artificial nerve for its robustness. The tube was made of PGA fiber mesh that was permeable to particles smaller than 600 KD. It had an inner diameter of 1 mm and a length of 55 ± 5 mm, and was designed to biodegrade 3 months after transplantation in vivo.14 For this study, only the outer cylinder without the inner honeycomb-shaped collagen was used,14 after being soaked in saline for 5 min.15

Experimental animals

We purchased 64 transgenic mice (Thy1 YFP 16) from the Jackson Laboratory (strain: B6.Cg-Tg[Thy1-YFP]16Jrs/J; 8–12 weeks old, weighing 23–28 g, 32 males and 32 females; Fig. 1B–D). In these mice, all axon fibers of the motor and sensory nerves constitutively express YFP fluorescence. Animal husbandry was conducted in accordance with the standards and regulations provided by the National Institutes of Health Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The study was approved by the Animal Care Committee of Juntendo University. The mice were kept in groups of four in sterile cages that were maintained at 22℃ ± 2℃ and 40–60% humidity under a 12-hour light/dark cycle, and they had free access to water and 15 kGy gamma-irradiated feed (CRF-1, Oriental Yeast Co.). They were sacrificed by cervical dislocation under deep anesthesia after all grafts had been harvested.

Experimental model

The experimental group (n = 48) underwent a nerve transection procedure on the sciatic nerve of each hind limb. Two weeks later, this was followed by two types of repair operations: direct epineurial suture (right hind limb) and artificial nerve connector (left hind limb). The control group (n = 16) underwent the same procedures but without the nerve transection or the repair operation. Equal numbers of male and female mice were assigned to each group.

Sciatic nerve injury model creation

The mice in the experimental group were anesthetized via inhaled sevoflurane (5% for induction, 2% for maintenance). On each hind limb, a 15 mm skin incision was made parallel to the femur to expose the sciatic nerve. To manipulate the sciatic nerve, a microscope (MZ16FA, Leica Microsystems) was used. Once the nerve was detached from the surrounding tissue, it was transected halfway between the hip and knee joint (Fig. 1E–G). The femoral muscle was partially peeled and placed between the nerve stumps to avoid natural reconnection, and the wound was closed using 5-0 nylon. The animals were then left for 2 weeks (to allow the formation of Wallerian degeneration in the distal stump) before the repair operations were performed.

Repair operations

The experimental group underwent the repair operations 2 weeks after the initial lesion-generating operation. Each mouse was placed under anesthesia, then its wounds were reopened, and the sciatic nerve stumps were exposed under a microscope (Fig. 1H and I). The Wallerian degeneration was confirmed by the disappearance of YFP expression in the distal stump (Fig. 1J and K). The ends of both stumps were debrided to the minimum extent to remove neuromas, and the two types of nerve repair (one to each hind limb) were performed as follows.

Epineurial suture – Direct repair (DR)

The right hind limb of each each experimental mouse was repaired using a direct epineurial suture, which was conducted with two 9-0 nylon stitches (Fig. 2A– C).

Nerve repair using nerve connector – Connector repair (CR)

The left hind limb of each experimental mouse was repaired using a 3 mm artificial nerve. The artificial nerve was interposed with a stitch of 9-0 nylon on each end. Approximately 1 mm of each nerve end was inserted into the conduit, leaving 1 mm between the stumps inside the conduit (Fig. 2A, D, and E).

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

To analyze gene expression at the repair site, tissue between 1 mm proximal and 1 mm distal from the suture (in the case of DR) or all tissue inside the conduit (in the case of CR) was harvested and subjected to qRT-PCR at 3 days, 1 week, and 2 weeks after the repair operation (n = 24). The expression levels of a macrophage migration marker (CD68), an angiogenesis marker (vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]), an endothelial marker (platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule [PECAM1], also known as CD31), Schwan cell migration markers (SOX10 and S100), and neurotrophins (neurotrophin-3 [NTF-3], brain-derived neurotrophic factor [BDNF], and nerve growth factor [NGF]) were analyzed. The tissue was extracted and stored in RNAlater solution at −4°C overnight and then stored at −80°C until RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Plus Universal Mini Kit (QIAGEN), and RNA purity and concentration were assessed using a NanoPhotometer (IMPLEN). RNA samples with a 260 nm/280 nm ratio between 1.8 and 2.0 were used for qRT-PCR. We used a high-capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit (Applied Biosystems) for reverse transcription into cDNA and TaqMan Fast Advanced Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) for qRT-PCR. All primers were purchased from Applied Biosystems, and the measured values were compared using GAPDH as a reference gene. An ABI 7500 FAST PCR system (Applied Biosystems) was used for thermocycling, and the conditions were 95°C for 20 s, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 3 s and 62°C for 30 s. The amount of each target gene relative to the GAPDH reference gene was determined using the comparative threshold cycle method, and the mean values were calculated.

An Analysis of Repair by using a nNerve cConnector as an aAlternative for dDirect rRepair in pPeripheral nNerve iInjury

Introduction

Nerve injuries can impose a heavy burden on patients' quality of life. AltThough direct epineurialum and perineurialum sutures are the classic techniques most commonly used for peripheral nerve injury, they are often accompanied with by undesirable tension and their surgical outcomes are can be less than satisfactory.(1-)(2)(3)(4) Such could be due toThese sutures can cause axon misalignments (such as miss direction, overlapping, and buckling) of axons , ingrowth of scar tissue ingrowth into the repair site, and or tension-induced ischemia around the stumps, all of which can leading to poor fascicular coaptation.(5) To overcome these problems, several newer technologies methods, such as connector repair, have been considered.(6)

Previous studies have suggested that utilizing using a nerve conduit as a connector (covering the repair site and leaving a very short gap between the stumps) for peripheral nerve repair, covering the repair site and leaving a very short gap between the stumps, provides outcomes that are equivalent to, or better than, those of direct suture repair.(7-)(8)(9) It isNerves generally considered that nerves regenerate along the length of the nerve conduit in a selective manner, such that thewith proximal motor nerves migratinge to join the distal motor nerves.(10,)(11) The intentional gap in the connector is known to provides an area for this selective reinnervation, thus encouraging natural re-growth while preventing the aforementioned misalignments.

The cConnector also provides a physical barrier to preventing the infiltration of scar tissue, in effect allowing the diffusion of nutrients to the healing repair site.(12,)(13) Thise barrier prevents the any potential uncontrolled sprouting to the outside of the coaptation site,(12) while and itsthe additional length relocates the sutures away from the coaptation site, thus reducing the risk of tension and tension-induced ischemia around the stumps. The use of a connectors also reduces decreases the number of sutures required for the nerve coaptation, which potentially may reduces surgical time.(6,)(12)

While the employmentThe use of a nerve conduit as a nerve connector has been known to reportedly achieved outcomes equivalent to, or better than, those produced by direct suture repair; ,however, its the underlying mechanisms of the conduit and how the response of thethe axons behave in the conduitit still remain unclear. In tThe present study, we investigates the peripheral nerve repair mechanisms inside of an artificial nerve conduit through across a short gap. To do this, we performed Sserial in vivo imaging using of transgenic mice which that constitutively express yellow fluorescent protein (YFP), fluorescence and analyzedsis of gene expressions at the repair, were conducted while and recorded various histomorphometric were taken. The results wereWe compared all conduit repair findings against their direct suture repair counter-parts and against the control. FThe final recovery was quantified through functional assessments.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of nerve conduit

For the present study, we used a bBioabsorbable polyglycolic acid (PGA) conduit filled with collagen in a honeycomb-like structure (Nerbridge, Toyobo Co. Ltd.; Fig. 1A); used in this study are this product is commercially available and hasve been approved by the Japanese government as a medical device for clinical practice by the Japanese Government since 2013. We selected Tthis artificial nerve was selected for this study for its robustness. The tube was made of PGA fiber mesh, that was permeable for to particles smaller than 600 KD., with theIt had an inner diameter of 1 mm and the a length of 55 ± 5 mm, and was designed to biodegrade 3 months after transplantation in vivo.(14) For the presentthis study, only the outer cylinder without the inner honeycomb--shaped collagen was used,(14) after being soakeding in saline for 5 minutes.(15)

Experimental Aanimals

In this study, We purchased 64 transgenic mice (Thy1 -yellow fluorescent protein ( YFP) 16), available from tThe Jackson Laboratory, ( strain : B6.Cg-Tg[Thy1-YFP]16Jrs/J; 8–12 weeks old, weighing 23–28 g, 32 males and 32 females; Fig. 1B–DB6. Cg-Tg (Thy1-YFP) 16 Jrs/J) . In these mice, with all axon fibers of the motor and sensory nerves constitutively express ing YFP fluorescence. were employed (8-12 weeks old, weighing 23-28 g, 32 males and 32 females, Fig. 1B, C and D). The aAnimal husbandry was conducted in accordance to with the standards and regulations provided by the National Institutes of Health Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The study was approved by the Animal Care Committee of Juntendo University. The mMice were kept in groups of four in a sterile cages that were maintained at 22℃ ± 2℃ and 40-60% humidity under a 12-hour light/dark cycle. The mice, and they had free access to water and 15- kGy gamma-irradiated feed (CRF-1, Oriental Yeast Co.). Animals They were sacrificed by cervical dislocation under deep anesthesia after the all grafts were had been harvested.

Experimental model

The experimental group (n = 48) underwent a nerve transection procedure to create an injury toon both the sciatic nerve of each hind limbs. which were laterTwo weeks later, this was followed by two types of repair operations:, direct epineurialum suture (right hind limb) and artificial nerve connector (left hind -limb). The control group (n = 16) underwent the same procedures but without the nerve transection or the repair operation. Equal numbers of male and female and male mice were assigned to each group.

-Creation of Ssciatic nerve injury model creation

The mice in the Eexperimental group were anesthetized with inhalation anesthesia ofvia inhaled sevoflurane (5% sevoflurane for induction, 2% for maintenance). On each hind limb, Aa 15 mm skin incision was made parallel to the femur on the both hind limbs to expose the sciatic nerves. For To manipulateion of the sciatic nerve, a microscope was used (MZ16FA, Leica Microsystems) was used. Once the nerve was detached from the surrounding tissues, it was transected at the halfway between the hip and knee joint (Fig. 1E–, F and G). The Ffemoral muscle was partially peeled and placed between the nerve stumps to avoid natural reconnection, and the wound was closed using 5-0 nylon. The animals were then left for 2 weeks for (to allow the formation of Wallerian degeneration in the distal stump) before the repair operations were conducted performed.

-Repair operations

The experimental group underwent the repair operations two 2 weeks after the initial lesion-generating operation. Each mouse was placed Uunder anesthesia, the then its wounds wereas reopened, and the sciatic nerve stumps were exposed under the a microscope (Fig. 1H and I). The formation of Wallerian degeneration was confirmed through by the disappearance of YFP fluorescence expression in the distal stump (Fig. 1J and K). The ends of both stumps were debrided to the minimum extent in order to remove the neuromas, and the two types of nerve repair (one to each hind limb) were performed to each hind limbas follows.

Epineurialum suture –- Dddirect repair (DR)

The right hind limb of each each experimental mouseTo every right hindlimb was repaired using, a direct epineurialum suture, which was conducted with two stitches of 9-0 nylon stitches (Fig. 2A –, B and C).

Nerve repair using nerve connector –- Cconnector repair (CR)

Every left hindlimbThe left hind limb of each experimental mouse was repaired using a 3 mm artificial nerve. The artificial nerve was interposed with a stitch of 9-0 nylon on either each end. Approximately 1 mm of the each nerve -ends were was inserted into the conduit, leaving a distance of 1 mm between the stumps inside the conduit (Fig. 2A, D, and E).

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

To analyze the gene expressions at the repair site, in the case of DR, tissues between 1 mm proximal and 1 mm distal from the suture (in the case of DR), and in the case of CR, or all tissues inside the conduit (in the case of CR), wasere harvested and examined by subjected to qRT-PCR at 3 days, 1 week, and 2 weeks after the repair operation (n = 24). The eExpressions levels of a macrophage migration marker (CD68), an angiogenesis marker (vascular endothelial growth factor ([VEGF)]), an endothelial marker (platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule CD31[(PECAM-1)], also known as CD31), Schwan cell migration markers (SOX10, and S100), and neurotrophins (neurotrophin-3 [(NTF-3)] , brain-derived neurotrophic factor [(BDNF)], and nerve growth factor [(NGF)]) were analyzed. The tissues were was extracted and stored in RNAlater solution at -4°C overnight, and then stored at -80°C until RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted with using an RNeasy Plus Universal Mini Kkit (QIAGEN), and RNA purity and concentration were assessed using a NanoPhotometer (IMPLEN). RNA samples with a 260 nm/280 nm ratio between 1.8 and 2.0 were used for qRT-PCR. We used a high-capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit (Applied Biosystems) for reverse transcription into cDNA and TaqMan Fast Advanced Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) for qRT-PCR. All primers were purchased from Applied Biosystems, and the measured values were compared with using GAPDH as a reference gene. An ABI 7500 FAST PCR system (Applied Biosystems) was used for The thermocycling, and the conditions were 95°C for 20 seconds , followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 3 seconds and 62°C for 30 seconds, on an ABI 7500 FAST PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The amount of each target gene relative to the GAPDH reference gene was determined using the comparative threshold cycle method, and the mean values were calculated.

Editorial
Your paper has been edited according to the requirements of your target journal and per your preference for US English.
Scientific
While it is acceptable and common practice to discuss things like the "global disease burden" on a population level, avoiding the phrase "burden" is recommended with regard to specific patients or the impact of an illness on patient quality of life. Please consider revising to "Nerve injuries can drastically reduce patients' quality of life".
Scientific
Consider citing here new research published by Zheng et al. in Theranostics on how combining aligned electrospun nanofibers with decellularized matrix hydrogel supports nerve regeneration through both topological and biochemical guidance.
Editorial
This generally repeats the opening sentence of the second paragraph, so it seems redundant here. A transition could be provided to capture the essence here without this being repeated. Example: "While the nerve conduit has achieved equivalent or better outcomes compared to direct suture repair, the underlying mechanisms …"
Scientific
This is a hot topic. Please see our comment in the Discussion regarding the recently published paper by Cicero et al. in Polymers on peripheral nerve regeneration using synthetic biopolymers.
Scientific
It would be beneficial to emphasize in the Discussion section that recent literature on this topic has largely been limited to conceptual scenarios without sufficient exploration of practical implementation. Peer reviewers are likely to expect detailed descriptions in the Methods section regarding the criteria and protocols used for functional assessments.
Editorial
This heading has been adopted per the recommendations of your target journal's guidelines.
Scientific
Please ensure that the order of the methods aligns with the order of the results. This consistency helps reviewers and readers follow the logical progression of the study.
Editorial
Please include the manufacturer's location. This holds for all manufacturers noted in the paper.
Editorial
Please consider adding a citation here for the source.
Editorial
Please use either kDa (for kilodaltons) or Kd (for the sorption distribution coefficient, which should be defined as an abbreviation), as applicable.
Scientific
Please note that this cited publication includes a clear and illustrative figure of the fiber mesh structure, which nicely demonstrates its characteristics. Consider including a similar figure here to visually support the description of the nerve conduit. A reference to the sample image is provided in the Results section, which could guide the creation of this figure.
Editorial
The text doesn't make it clear how this citation is related; a clarification would be helpful here.
Editorial
Please consider adding the approval number, if available.
Scientific
We note that the Supplementary Table lists a different number of animals per group (n = 50 for the experimental group vs. n = 48 mentioned here), but this discrepancy is not addressed in the text. Please clarify or provide an explanation for this difference to ensure consistency and transparency.
Scientific
Suggestion: "The control group (n = 16) experienced the same conditions as the experimental group but did not undergo nerve transections or repair operations." It is unclear what procedures occurred for the control mice if no nerve transection or repair occurred. What occurred for the creation of sham lesions and repairs?
Scientific
The microscope was likely not used for the manipulation itself but rather for the precise viewing necessary for such manipulation, so a slight revision could be beneficial here: "To allow manipulation of the sciatic nerve, a microscope (MZ16FA, Leica Microsystems) was used."
Scientific
This part of the process could benefit from further explanation to ensure repeatability in future studies.
Scientific
Consider including a study flow diagram or timeline in the Supplementary Materials to visually outline the sequence of events, from the initial lesion-generating operation to the repair operations and subsequent assessments. This would provide readers with a clear overview of the experimental design.
Editorial
The term has been modified here for clarity. Please check that this reflects your intended meaning.
Editorial
Please note that because you measured the mRNA (rather than protein) levels, the gene symbols (rather than the protein symbols) have been used throughout the manuscript. Please check that this change is acceptable, and make sure that consistent gene symbols are used in all figures/tables.

Fair & Simple Pricing

No Hidden Fees. No Surprises. Just Transparent Pricing.

The price you see is exactly what you'll pay, with no hidden fees or surprises—guaranteed.

1 - 500
words
501 - 5,000
words
5001 - 10,000
words
10,001 - 15,000
words
15,001 - 20,000
words
20,001 - 25,000
words
25,000+
words
Priority

Up to 14 days

$100

Up to 15 days

$0.20 per word

Up to 28 days

$0.20 per word

Up to 30 days

$0.20 per word

Up to 32 days

$0.20 per word

Up to 34 days

$0.20 per word

Custom
Expedited

Up to 10 days

$125

Up to 11 days

$0.25 per word

Up to 20 days

$0.25 per word

Up to 22 days

$0.25 per word

Up to 24 days

$0.25 per word

Up to 26 days

$0.25 per word

Custom
Ultra Express

Up to 6 days

$160

Up to 7 days

$0.32 per word

Up to 12 days

$0.32 per word

Up to 14 days

$0.32 per word

Up to 16 days

$0.32 per word

Up to 18 days

$0.32 per word

Custom
Word Count Priority Expedited Ultra Express
1 - 500

Up to 14 days

$100

Up to 10 days

$125

Up to 6 days

$160

501 - 5,000

Up to 15 days

$0.20 per word

Up to 11 days

$0.25 per word

Up to 7 days

$0.32 per word

5001 - 10,000

Up to 28 days

$0.20 per word

Up to 20 days

$0.25 per word

Up to 12 days

$0.32 per word

10,001 - 15,000

Up to 30 days

$0.20 per word

Up to 22 days

$0.25 per word

Up to 14 days

$0.32 per word

15,001 - 20,000

Up to 32 days

$0.20 per word

Up to 24 days

$0.25 per word

Up to 16 days

$0.32 per word

20,001 - 25,000

Up to 34 days

$0.20 per word

Up to 26 days

$0.25 per word

Up to 18 days

$0.32 per word

25,000+ Custom Custom Custom

Trusted by Researchers Worldwide

Get Your Personalized Quote in Seconds

Know exactly what to expect—no hidden fees, no surprises. Simply upload your manuscript to receive a personalized, instant quote tailored to your needs.

 Upload Documents
 

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Chat Icon Still need help? Chat with us.

What services are provided in the Publication Success Package?
Scribendi's Publication Success Package includes subject-matter content review and editing, formatting according to your specified journal requirements, and cover letter creation. You will also receive a professional editing certificate with your revised manuscript, as well as unlimited language revision on your manuscript for one full year following the receipt of your order.